Kumarasamy v. Sampath
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn, effectively closing the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.2438 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P(MD)No.2438 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD) No.10859 of 2018
1. Kumarasamy
2. Ramanathan
3. Rajarajeswari
4. Rani Kayathridevi ... Petitioners/Petitioners/Plaintiffs
Vs.
- Sampath
- Nagaraj
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kumarasamy
- petitioner
Ramanathan
- petitioner
Rajarajeswari
- petitioner
Rani Kayathridevi
- respondent
Sampath
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court