Saratha v. Vethanayagam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court held that since the execution petition was closed and property possession was delivered, nothing remained in the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC, which was accordingly closed.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.2245 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P(MD)No.2245 of 2019 and C.M.P. (MD) No.11613 of 2019
1. Saratha
2. Minor Anitha
3. Minor. Ashok
- 4.Jayasingh
- 5.Rathinam
- 6.Thamilarasan
- 7.Rajarathinam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition survives after the execution petition is closed and possession is delivered.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saratha and Others
- respondent
Vethanayagam
Coram
Battu Devanand
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court