Rajagopal, v. Jeyarani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The court held that the petition abated because the petitioner had died and no successor had approached the court.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(MD).No.2307 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2307 of 2018 and
C.M.P(MD) No.10296 of 2018
Rajagopal
... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
-vs-
Jeyarani ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.08.2018 in I.A.No.139 of 2016 in unnumbered A.S.No.Nil of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Thoothukudi.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed as abated due to the death of the original petitioner?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajagopal
- respondent
Jeyarani
Coram
C.Kumarappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court