Dismissed

Ramamoorthy (Died) v. Nirmala

Madras HC14 Aug 2023CRP(MD)/1944/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench closed two revision petitions under Article 227 filed by a decree holder to strike off execution court applications. The Court held that since underlying strike-off applications were disposed of on merits, nothing survived for this court to adjudicate.

What did the court decide?

Both revision petitions were closed as there was nothing left to adjudicate after the underlying applications were disposed of on merits.

Ramamoorthy (Died) Vs Nirmala — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD)

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.08.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD) and

¶7

M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2015 C.R.P.(MD).No.1944 of 2015

¶8

Ramamoorthy (Died) Saroja (Died) 1.Venkatesan 2.Baskaran 3.Muhundan 4.Ramesh 5.Rani @ Sumathi 6.Padmavathi 7.Vijayalakshmi Renganayagi (Died)

¶9

...Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.Nirmala 2.Hari 3.Ravi Dhanarasu (Died) ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: This Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to dismiss the petition in E.A.No.43 of 2010 dated 04.03.2010 in E.P.No.54 of 2003 in O.S.No.513 of 1988 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Musiri.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murali For R-1 : Mr.S.Ramesh For R-2 & R-3 : No Appearance

¶14

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD)

¶16

C.R.P.(MD).No.1945 of 2015

¶17

Ramamoorthy (Died) Saroja (Died) 1.Venkatesan 2.Baskaran 3.Muhundan 4.Ramesh 5.Rani @ Sumathi 6.Padmavathi 7.Vijayalakshmi Renganayagi (Died)

...Petitioners

Vs.

Nirmala

...Respondent

PRAYER: This Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to dismiss the petition in E.A.No.44 of 2010 dated 04.03.2010 in E.P.No.54 of 2003 in O.S.No.513 of 1988 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Musiri.

¶23

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murali

¶24

For Respondent : Mr.S.Ramesh

¶25

COMMON ORDER

¶26

C.R.P.(MD).No.1944 of 2015 has been filed by the decree

¶27

holder to strike off an application filed under Section 47 of C.P.C. by the judgment debtor.

¶28

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD)

¶30

C.R.P.(MD).No.1945 of 2015 has been filed by the revision petitioner to strike off an application filed under Order 21 Rule 97 of C.P.C.

¶31

Since both these applications have been disposed of on merits by the Execution Court, nothing survives to be adjudicated.

¶32

Accordingly, both these Revision Petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶33

14.08.2023

¶34

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No tsg

¶35

¶36

The District Munsif Court, Musiri.

¶37

The Record Keeper, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD)

¶40

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

¶41

tsg

¶42

CRP.(MD).Nos.1944 and 1945 of 2015 (NPD)

¶43

14.08.2023

¶44

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ramamoorthy (Died) v. Nirmala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramamoorthy (Died) v. Nirmala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marudhavana Desikar(Died) Vs M. Jagannathan

Krishnan, Vs Aandi Ambalam

The Tamil Nadu Agricultural Vs Korakkan

Kannan Vs Renuka

S. Suryan Vs S. Gandhimathi

Vanaja Vs T.Narayanasamy (Died)