Kannan v. Renuka
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court examined a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 to set aside an order allowing the impleadment of a third party in a suit. The court was satisfied that the proposed party, Papayee@ Papathi, had died, rendering impleadment unnecessary. The revision petition was closed, and the trial court was directed to dispose of the suit on or before 31.01.20
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petition closed; suit directed to be disposed of by the trial court by 31.01.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD).No.1695 of 2014 (PD)
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.R.P.(MD).(PD).No.1695 of 2014 and MP(MD).No.1 of 2014
Kannan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.Renuka
2.Vasantha 3.Papayee@ Papathi ... Respondents
PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the civil revision petition and set aside the order made in I.A.No.6 of 2014 in O.S.No.409 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Karur, dated 22.07.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sivabalan For Respondents : No appearance
1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision challenging the impleadment of a deceased third party should allow the petition or close the proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kannan
- respondent
Renuka
- respondent
Vasantha
- respondent
Papayee@ Papathi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court