reported in 2019 (2) CTC 313 in the case of Tanu Ram Bora Vs. Promod Ch.Das (D) through LRs and others, in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act provides that where a person fraudulently or erroneously represents that he is authorised to transfer certain immovable property and professes to transfer such property for consideration, such transfer shall, at the option of the transferee, operates on any interest which the transferor may acquire in such property at any time during which the contract of transfer subsists. Thus, if at the time of transfer, the vendor/transferor might have a defective title or have no title or no right or interest, however subsequently the transferor requires the right, title or interest and the contract of transfer subsists, in that case at the option of the transferee, such a transfer is valid. In such a situation, the transferor cannot be permitted to challenge the transfer or the transferor has no option to raise the dispute in making the transfer. The intention and objects behind Section 43 of Transfer of Property Act seems to
