Disposed

Neelamegan v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC2 Mar 2023CRP/3151/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, disposed of a Civil Revision Petition. While dismissing the petition, the Court ordered status quo and directed the trial court to dispose of the underlying suit within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; status quo directed; trial court directed to dispose of suit within six months.

Neelamegan Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.03.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.20577 of 2019

¶7

Neelamegan

¶8

Valliammal

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the District Collector, Sathuvachari,

¶12

Vellore, Vellore District.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam, Vellore District.

¶14

The Thanigai Polur Village Panchayat, Represented by its President, Thanigai Polur Village & Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.

¶15

Respondents

¶16

Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to allow the Civil Revision Petition and set aside the fair and order dated 31.01.19 made in C.M.A.No.11 of 2017 on the file of Learned Subordinate Judge, Arakkonam confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 05.09.17 made in

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019

¶20

I.A.No.417 of 2016 in O.S.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the Learned District Munsiff, Arakkonam.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Jeremiah

¶22

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed as against the fair and order made in C.M.A.No.11 of 2017 dated 31.01.2019, on the file of Learned Subordinate Judge, Arakkonam confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 05.09.17 made in I.A.No.417 of 2016 in O.S.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the Learned District Munsiff, Arakkonam, thereby dismissing the petition seeking interim injunction.

¶23

The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants. The petitioners filed a suit for declaration, mandatory injunction and consequential permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. Pending suit, the petitioners filed an application seeking interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. It was dismissed and aggrieved by the same, the petitioners Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019

¶26

filed an appeal in C.M.A.No.11 of 2017 and the appellate Court also dismissed the appeal, confirming the order passed by the Court below. Aggrieved by the same, this present Civil Revision Petition.

¶27

Pending this petition, this Court ordered status quo directing the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the suit property.

¶28

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the parties

¶29

are directed to maintain status quo in respect of the suit property, till the disposal of the suit. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

¶31

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶32

02.03.2023

¶33

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No mn

¶34

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J,

¶35

Page 3 of 4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019

¶38

¶39

¶40

The Subordinate Judge, Arakkonam.

¶41

The District Munsiff, Arakkonam.

¶42

C.R.P.No.3151 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.20577 of 2019

¶43

02.03.2023

¶44

Page 4 of 4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Neelamegan v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelamegan v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.M. Sivakumar Vs Kaaliammal @ Manoramma

Gouthaman Vs Alagesan

V.N.Devadoss Vs Jayammal (Died)

R.Ramesh Vs Varadan

Muthuraman Vs Jayapriya Chit Funds(P) Ltd.

N.Arockiyadoss Vs Sriram City Union Finance Ltd.