Kaliyan v. Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an order allowing amendment to a suit for declaration of temple property. There was no infirmity or illegality.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.3603 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.03.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P.No.3603 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.16872 of 2017
- Kaliyan 2. Chinnapparaj .... Petitioners Vs
- Ganesan
- Arumugam 3. Kanagasabai 4. Jegarayam .... Respondents
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 03.08.2017 made in I.A.No.543 of 2015 in O.S.No.244 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can find infirmity in the trial court's order allowing an amendment to a suit seeking declaration of temple property.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kaliyan and Chinnaparaj
- respondent
Ganesan
- respondent
Arumugam
- respondent
Kanagasabai
- respondent
Jegarayam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court