M.P.Farook v. D.Govindarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
A landlord sought revision against a decree confirming eviction. The High Court closed the revision alleging the tenant had vacated possession. Connected miscellaneous petition also closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition closed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P. No. 2518 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :03.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN C.R.P. No. 2518 of 2022
and C.M.P.No.12932 of 2023
Mr.M.P. Farook
...Petitioner
.Vs. D. Govindarajan ...Respondent
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the TN Building( Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1960 to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 20.10.2021 passed in R.C.A.No. 96 of 2018 by the VIII Judge, (FAC) Small Causes Court at Chennai, confirming the fair and decretal order dated 24.04.2017 passed in RCOP No.1185 of 2013 by the XV Judge, Small causes Court at Chennai and pass orders.
For Petitioner : Mr. D. Muthukumar for Paul For Respondent : Mr.V. Sivakumar for P.B.Ramanujan
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr.M.P. Farook
- respondent
D. Govindarajan
Coram
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court