Disposed

R.Ranganathan v. a.Vadivel

Madras HC20 Jul 2023CRP/2445/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This civil revision petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a senior citizen, sought a direction for the District Court to dispose of a pending second appeal expeditiously. The Court directed the appropriate DCS judge to dispose of the appeal as early as possible.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai to dispose of appeal A.S.No.10 of 2020 expeditiously.

R.Ranganathan Vs a.Vadivel — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.07.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶7

R. Ranganathan .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

A. Vadivel

¶10

K. Venkatesan (died)

¶11

V. Vijaya 3. V. Murugan 4.G. Bharathy 5. L. Komathy .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the Principal District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai, to dispose of the appeal in A.S.No. 10 of 2020 on its file within the time that may be fixed by this Honourable Court.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner :Mr.P. Mani

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This petition is filed seeking a direction to direct the Principal District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai, to dispose of the appeal in A.S.No. 10 of 2020 on its file within the time

¶19

The facts of the case is that the petitioner herein has entered into a sale agreement with one K.Venkatesan, . After entering into the agreement the said K.Venkatesan passed away and failed to execute the sale agreement. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed O.S.No.45 of 2010 on the file of the Principal, Sub Judge, Arni impleading the respondents herein as they are the legal heirs of the deceased K.Venkatesan, and the same was ordered in favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved over the same the first respondent herein preferred an appeal in A.S.No. 10 of 2020 on the file of District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai and the same is pending. Hence the petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to dispose of the said A.S. as early as possible.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

2/4

¶22

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

¶24

petitioner herein is a senior citizen and he was made to run from pillar to post to attend the Court proceeding which is not a justifiable one. Hence he prays to allow this petition.

¶25

In view of the above, the learned Judge, District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai is directed to dispose of the A.S.No. 10 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible.

¶26

With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶27

20.07.2023

¶28

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No smn To The Principal District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai,

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/4

¶31

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶32

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.

¶33

smn

¶34

C.R.P.No.2445 of 2023

¶35

20.07.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/4

R.Ranganathan v. a.Vadivel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ranganathan v. a.Vadivel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Tamilarasi Vs Senthil Kumar

V.Suresh Vs Sarojini @ Sathya

G. Anand Vs G.M. Moneesha

B.B.Joghee, Vs The Management

R.Sankar Vs M.Bhuvaneswari

Ishwariyalakshmi Vs P.Aswanth Birla