date itself, without providing any opportunity to the petitioner, the Court below allowed the application on 10.02.2023. Immediately, on 24.02.2023, the petitioner herein filed an application in I.A.No. 4 of 2023 under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex-parte order dated 10.02.2023, but the Court below simply dismissed the above application as not sustainable and the same is liable to be set aside. The Court below failed to provide an opportunity to file counter in the above application before considering the application to mark additional documents. Therefore, the Court below ought to have considered that the respondent while filing the application in I.A.No. 892 of 2017, had not marked any document to substantiate the averments in the said application, whereas after six years, the respondent has filed the above application in I.A.No. 3 of 2023 to mark some documents and hence, it is just and necessary that the petitioner has to file counter in the said application and contest the same. Hence, the court below ought to have provided an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the said application. Hence, the said order is liable to be set aside.