Disposed

Murugan v. Subbaramaniyan

Madras HC14 Jul 2023CRP/2316/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi, to dispose of suit O.S.No.455 of 2019 within 12 months due to extraordinary delay. Parties were ordered to cooperate for trial without adjournments and file a report upon disposal.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi to dispose of suit O.S.No.455 of 2019 within 12 months; parties directed to cooperate.

Murugan Vs Subbaramaniyan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

Murugan

... Petitioner

Vs.

Subbaramaniyan

¶11

Veerasamy

¶12

Dhanam

¶13

Ramanujam Ammal

¶14

The District Collector, Collector Office, Villupuram District – 605602.

¶15

The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Chinnasalem – 606201.

¶16

The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Chinnasalem – 606201.

¶17

The Village Administrative Officer, Chinnasalem (North), Chinnasalem – 606201. ... Respondents

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶21

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to issue the direction to the Subordinate Court at Kallakurichi to dispose the suit in O.S.No.455 of 2019 within time frame by this Court.

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed for a direction to the

¶24

learned Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.455 of 2019 within the stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶25

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner herein is the first defendant and the first respondent herein is the plaintiff. The first respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.455 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi for declaration in respect of the suit property.

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of

¶30

the written statement there is no progress in the above suit for the past four years and the petitioner is really affected person because his self acquired property is in dispute. He further submitted that from the beginning he attended the Court for each of every hearing, but extraordinary delay had happened in the said suit filed by the first respondent/plaintiff in O.S.No.455 of 2019 before the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present civil revision petition for a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.455 of 2019 within the stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶31

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

¶32

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned

¶33

Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.455 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period

¶34

3/5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶37

12 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file report

¶38

before this Court after disposal of that suit. The parties concerned are

¶39

directed to co-operate for trial, without getting any adjournment.

¶40

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the

¶41

above direction. No costs.

¶42

14.07.2023

¶43

Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶44

¶45

¶46

The Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi.

¶47

4/5

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶50

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.

¶51

¶52

C.R.P.No.2316 of 2023

¶53

14.07.2023

¶54

5/5

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Murugan v. Subbaramaniyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan v. Subbaramaniyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Suresh Kumar Vs a.Thulasi

A. Manohar Vs Geetha Lakshmi

V.S.Jayarani Vs Balasubramaniam

R.Chinnasamy Vs Tamilnadu State Transport

R.Subhalakshmi Vs M.Vishnuvardhanen

M.Duraikannu Vs T.Rani