location and identification of property but the executing court without giving fair opportunity to the petitioner herein to establish the same, rejected the petition without taking on file as such is unfair and liable to be set aside. Furthermore, he submitted that as a absolute owner he has nearly 1009 square feet in new survey number 22/2 old survey number 2081 with old door number 24, 24- A, 24-B and new door number 53,54,55,62 by way of purchase from one karthikeyan through two sale deeds of the year 2014. Thereafter he is in possession and enjoyment of the said land and building right from the date of said purchase. In fact, the said property was originally partitioned between the owners and the schedule B of the said partitioned deed and thereafter it was purchased by the petitioner in the year of 2014. subsequently, the petitioner has changed the property tax, water tax, electricity connections in the petitioner name in respect of the property which was purchased in the year 2014. The entire mutation of records was completed and the petitioner has been carrying out iron scraps business in the said property in the name and style of ARK enterprises and the property tax is assessed by the corporation of Chennai and electricity connections is stands in the name of the petitioner. While being so, the petitioner came to know about the EP proceedings pending between the respondent and some
