M.R.Bhaarath v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition seeking modification of a bond condition was dismissed by the single judge after the Government Advocate objected due to non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
The petition for modification of the bond condition was dismissed.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.3324 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.22979 of 2021
Crl.M.P.No.3324 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.22979 of 2021
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed to modify the condition in Pr.No.3 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.431 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.22979 of 2021 dated 28.01.2022, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- instead of Rs.50,00,000/- and for remaining deposit of Rs.25,00,000/- the petitioner shall produce a original title deed along with encumbrance certificate which is annexed at pg.No.22 Document No.1589 of 2008 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2.Heard both sides.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner has not complied the condition and raised objection to modify the condition. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to modify the condition.
- Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
02.11.2023
rri
1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unspecified Petitioner
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
Coram
T.V.THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court