The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous because the subject matter involved possession taken over two years before the hearing date.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(NPD)No.1170 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.10.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.1170 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.6310 of 2020
M.Ratinambal (Deceased)
1.R.Tamilarasi 2.M.Rajendran
3.K.Poongothai
4.M.Sekar 5.J.Valarmathi 6.M.Raja Srinivasan
7.M.Rajasundarapandian ... Petitioners
Vs.
T.K.S.Nagar Welfare Association, Rep. by its President, Y.K.Naidu, No.56, T.K.S.Nagar, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai – 600 019. … Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India praying to set aside the order and the decreetal order in E.A.No.44 of 2018 in E.P.No.5 of 2015 in O.S.No.181 of 1997 dated 06.01.2020 on the file
of District Munsif, Thiruvottiyur.
Page No.1 of 4
C.R.P(NPD)No.1170 of 2020
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thiagarajan For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabhakaran
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel on either
side submitted that the possession was taken over two years back i.e., on
15.03.2021. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
either side, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
19.10.2023
vm Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
Page No.2 of 4
C.R.P(NPD)No.1170 of 2020
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.
vm
C.R.P(PD)No.1170 of 2020
Page No.3 of 4
C.R.P(NPD)No.1170 of 2020
19.10.2023
Page No.4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed as infructuous given that possession was taken over two years prior to the order.
M.Ratinambal (Deceased) represented by 1.R.Tamilarasi 2.M.Rajendran 3.K.Poongothai 4.M.Sekar 5.J.Valarmathi 6.M.Raja Srinivasan 7.M.Rajasundarapandian
T.K.S.Nagar Welfare Association represented by Y.K.Naidu
J.Sathya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
