The court allowed petitions filed to condone a 96-day delay in representing certain CM.Ps and CR.Ps, being convinced by reasons in the affidavit without objection from respondents.
These petitions were ordered allowed to condone the delay of 96 days in representing the CM.Ps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.16902 & 16914 of 2023 in
C.R.P.Nos.449 & 1714 of 2019
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 96 days in representing the C.M.P.SR.Nos.14784 & 14789 of 2023 in C.R.P.Nos.449 & 1714 of 2019.
2.The learned Counsel for the
Respondents have no objection in allowing these petitions and this Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are ordered.
18.10.2023 kmm
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
