R.Raju v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal revision petition filed to set aside an order dismissing a petition for the return of a seized vehicle was dismissed as infructuous since the vehicle had already been returned to the petitioner before the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Crl.R.C.No.507 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
Crl.R.C.No.507 of 2022
R. Raju ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State represented by its Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Namakkal Namakkal District Crime No.98/2021 ... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 24.03.2022 passed in Crl.M.P. No.525 of 2022 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Namakkal.
For Petitioner : Mr.P. Kalimuthu For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Govt. Advocate (Crl. side)
Page 1 of 4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Raju
- respondent
The State represented by its Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Namakkal
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court