M.Arumugam v. Kamalakannan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants leave to the petitioner to prefer a criminal appeal against a Judgment dated 23.03.2022 dismissing a complaint for non-prosecution before the Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai.
What did the court decide?
Leave to prefer a criminal appeal is granted.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.22089 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR No.19672 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.22089 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.19672 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C, to grant leave to prefer an appeal against the judgment dated 23.03.2022 made in C.C.No.239 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No (Magisterial level), Tiruvannamalai.
- Heard Mr.N.Chandrasekar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
- A perusal of the order, dated 23.03.2022 made in C.C.No.239 of
2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No (Magisterial level), Tiruvannamalai shows that the complaint was dismissed for non prosecution.
4.In the circumstances, there are arguable points in the main appeal and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for.
- Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter under the caption "For Admission".
26.09.2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. should be granted against the dismissal of a complaint for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
R.HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court