Dismissed

Ramachandran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/9304/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail petition filed by an accused charged under sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 25 of the NDPS Act, 1985 for possession of 22 kgs of ganja. The High Court observed that a previous bail petition was dismissed on 17.04.2023 and noted no change in circumstances. Consequently, the court was not inclined to grant bail and dismissed the application.

What did the court decide?

The application for bail was dismissed as there was no change in circumstances since the dismissal of the previous bail petition.

Ramachandran Vs The Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRL OP(MD)No.9304 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.06.2023 PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

CRL OP(MD)No.9304 of 2023

¶5

Ramachandran ... Petitioner/Accused 2

¶6

¶7

The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Trichy District. (Crime No.40 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.ANAND, Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.T.SENTHIL KUMAR,

¶10

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶12

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.40 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶13

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.03.2023 for the offence under section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 25 of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.40 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.

¶15

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 04.03.2023, at 03.30 pm., based on the secret information, the respondent police went to the spot. At that time, two wheeler bearing Reg.No.TN 45 BW 3353, wherein the petitioner along with A1 have travelled and they were intercepted by the police team and on enquiry, it revealed that they were in possession of 22 kgs of ganja. Hence the case.

¶16

3.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶17

4.It is seen that this second bail petition and previous petition for bail was dismissed on 17.04.2023. There is no change https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL OP(MD)No.9304 of 2023

¶20

in circumstances. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed.

¶21

sd/06/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. GNS TO

¶22

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMJEE NAGAR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶23

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶24

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9304 of 2023 Date :06/06/2023 SA/VR/SAR. /14.06.2023/2P/4C

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/2

Ramachandran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Palaniselvi Vs a.R.Vishwanathan

Azhageswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Chidambaraselvaraj Vs Perumalnadar

S.Manoharan Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvaraj @ Selvan Vs The Inspector of Police

Saravanan @ Gundu Saravanan Vs The Inspector of Police