Dismissed

A.John Dinakaran @ Dinakaran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/4465/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the trial had concluded and the matter was posted for judgment pronouncement, making it inapposite to entertain the plea.

What did the court decide?

The criminal original petition and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed and closed.

A.John Dinakaran @ Dinakaran Vs The Inspector of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.06.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.2497 & 2499 of 2021

¶7

A.John Dinakaran @ Dinakaran ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.State rep. by its, The Inspector of Police, Sernthamaram Police Station, Tirunelveli District, in Crime No.288 of 2013.

¶10

... 1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶11

2.Murugesan ... 2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶12

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pursuant to the C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi and quash the same against this petitioner.

¶13

For Petitioner : No Appearance

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan for R1 Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, pending against the petitioner.

¶20

2.The petitioner is the accused No.1, in Crime No.288 of 2013, on the file of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC altered into 304(A), 109 IPC and Section 192 of M.V.Act, 1988 and now facing trial in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi.

¶21

3.Today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶22

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that now

¶23

the trial bas been completed before the trial Court and the matter has been posted before the trial Court for pronouncing Judgment on 26.06.2023.

¶24

5.Since the matter has been posted for pronouncing Judgment, this

¶25

petition cannot be entertained at this stage. Today there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021

¶29

6.In view of the above, this criminal original petition stands

¶30

dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶31

22.06.2023

¶32

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To

¶33

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi

¶34

2.The Inspector of Police, Sernthamaram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶35

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021

¶39

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

¶40

¶41

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4465 of 2021

¶42

22.06.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

A.John Dinakaran @ Dinakaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.John Dinakaran @ Dinakaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Perumal Vs The Inspector of Police

Perumal Vs The Inspector of Police

Jawahar Vs The Inspector of Police

Petchiammal Vs The Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services

Sivachidambaram Vs The Inspector of Police

Perumal Vs The Inspector of Police