Dismissed

Perumal v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/1732/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a criminal complaint was dismissed as infructuous upon the prosecution submitting that the investigation was completed and the charge sheet filed in Sessions Court.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty to challenge charge sheet granted; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Perumal Vs The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 21. 06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.1257 of 2022

¶7

Perumal ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶10

2.Vellaisamy ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records connected with Crime No.26 of 2021 dated 31.08.2021 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Alagumani For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.S. Saravanan

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records connected with Crime No.26 of 2021 dated 31.08.2021 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶18

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the investigation in Crime No.26 of 2021 has been completed and the final report was filed before the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases-II, Thoothukudi and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.17 of 2023.

¶19

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if so advised. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

21.06.2023

¶21

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022

¶25

tta

¶26

¶27

1.The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶28

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

3/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022

G.ILANGOVAN,J

tta

Order made in

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1732 of 2022

¶36

Dated: 21.06.2023

¶37

4/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Perumal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Muthukumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Veerapandi @ Pandiyan Vs The Inspector of Police

Perumal Vs The Inspector of Police

Jawahar Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajathiammal Vs The Inspector of Police