Dismissed

Pandi v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/396/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court examined a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a crime report. Withdrawing the matter from the list, the court made the petition infructuous following the completion of investigation and filing of the final report.

What did the court decide?

The petition stands dismissed as infructuous; petitioners are at liberty to challenge the charge sheet if advised.

Pandi Vs The Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20. 06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

¶7

1.Pandi 2.Sakthi ... Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Sivagangai.

¶10

2.Thavidan @ Karuppaiah ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in crime No.21 of 2021 dated 14.09.2021 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ramu For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.S.Rengasamy

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records in crime No.21 of 2021 dated 14.09.2021 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners.

¶18

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the investigation in Crime No.21 of 2021 has been completed and the final report was filed before the Judicial Magistrate-II, Sivagangai and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.17 of 2022.

¶19

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioners is at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if so advised.

¶20

20.06.2023

¶21

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No tta

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

¶25

¶26

1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Sivagangai.

¶27

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

G.ILANGOVAN,J

tta

Order made in

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.396 of 2022

¶35

Dated: 20.06.2023

¶36

4/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Pandi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhamodaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajesh Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Ganeshan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Muthukumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Veerapandi @ Pandiyan Vs The Inspector of Police

Suresh Babu Vs The Inspector of Police