Disposed

S.Ganeshan v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC19 Jun 2023CRL OP(MD)/1425/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition filed for police protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the court directed the designated police officer to consider the petitioner's representation regarding a threat to withdraw a case within one month and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2023 and pass suitable orders within one month.

S.Ganeshan Vs The Superintendent of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.06.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶7

S.Ganeshan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni.

¶10

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni.

¶11

3.The Inspector of Police, Devodhanapatti, Theni.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to issue a direction to the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members on the basis of the representation dated 05.01.2023.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kannithevan For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members on the basis of the representation dated 05.01.2023.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is facing charges under Sections 294(b), 323 of I(PC r/w 3(I)(r) & (s), 3(II)(V a) of SC/ST Act before the Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni in SPL.S.C.No.9 of 2020. He further submitted that the one of the accused threatened the petitioner to withdraw the above said case. Therefore, the petitioner has made representation dated 05.01.2023 to the first and second respondent and the same was not considered so far. Hence, the present petition has been field.

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the third respondent has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/4

¶24

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶25

In view of the above, the third respondent is hereby directed to

¶26

consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.01.2023 and pass suitable orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Depending upon the outcome of the representation, the petitioner shall workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings.

¶27

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands

¶28

disposed of.

¶29

19.06.2023

¶30

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No tta To

¶31

1.The Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni.

¶32

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni.

¶33

3.The Inspector of Police, Devodhanapatti, Theni.

¶34

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

3/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶38

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

¶39

tta

¶40

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1425 of 2023

¶41

19.06.2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

S.Ganeshan v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ganeshan v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Sheemah Vs The Commissioner

Shehu Umar Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Suresh Vs The Commissioner of Police

Dhamodaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajesh Vs The Inspector of Police

Kumar Vs The Superintendent of Police