Dismissed

C.Rajesh Kumar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Mar 2023CRL OP(MD)/3684/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet, holding that the matter was infructuous as the petitioner was already convicted in the same case and had filed a pending criminal appeal.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

C.Rajesh Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.03.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.THARANI

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.2007 and 2008 of 2020

Rajesh Kumar

...Petitioner

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Inspector of Police, AWPS, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.14 of 2018

¶11

2.Chitrakani

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying this Court to call for the records pertaining to Spl.S.C.No.35 of 2019 on the file of the Special Court for POSCO Act, FTC, Mahila Court, Virudhunagar district at Srivilliputhur.

¶14

For Petitioner : No Appearance For 1^st Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition is filed to quash the chargesheet in Spl.S.C.No.35 of 2019

¶17

on the file of the Special Court for POSCO Act, FTC, Mahila Court,

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020

¶21

Virudhunagar district at Srivilliputhur.

¶22

2.There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶23

3.On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the case in Spl.S.C.No. 35 of 2019 was ended in conviction of the petitioner. The petitioner was

¶24

convicted to undergo 10 years imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakhs only). Against the order, the petitioner has filed a criminal appeal in C.A.No.420 of 2022 and the same is pending.

¶25

4.In view of the submission made by the prosecution, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶26

17.03.2023

¶27

NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Mrn

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/4

¶30

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020

¶31

¶32

1.The Judge, Special Court for POSCO Act, FTC, Mahila Court, Virudhunagar district at Srivilliputhur.

¶33

2.The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶34

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020

¶38

R. THARANI,J.

¶39

Mrn

¶40

Crl.O.P(MD).No.3684 of 2020

¶41

17.03.2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

C.Rajesh Kumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Rajesh Kumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmanan Vs Tamilnadu State Transport

Ramesh Vs Thulasimani

Sethupathy @ Sethuraman Vs The Inspector of Police

National Insurance Company Vs Nachadalingam

Premkumar @ Premchandar Vs The Inspector of Police

R.Saranya Priyadharshini Vs The Inspector of Police