Dismissed
Ramesh v. Thulasimani
Madras HCCRL MP(MD)/340/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners sought stay of criminal proceedings and quashing of a criminal complaint. The High Court dismissed the petitions as they were ripe for argument, without moving to the merits at this stage.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CRL MP(MD) No.340 of 2020
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
¶4
Thursday, the Sixteenth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Three
¶5
PRESENT
¶6
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
¶7
CRL MP(MD) Nos.340 and 341 of 2020 IN
¶8
CRL OP(MD) No.804 of 2020
¶9
1 RAMESH
¶10
- 2 EBANEZER
¶11
- 3 RAJI
¶12
- 4 MANOHARAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
¶13
(IN BOTH PETITIONS)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RAMESH
- petitioner
EBANEZER
- petitioner
RAJI
- petitioner
MANOHARAN
- respondent
THULASIMANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court