Petitions to quash FIR adjourned due to petitioner absence; prosecution directed to file charge-sheet within two months; petitions dismissed for default.
Prosecution directed to file charge-sheet within two months; petitions dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13644 & 13645 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.13644 and 13645 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6285 & 6287 of 2020
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13644 of 2020
Aravindh Petitioner / Accused No.4
Vs.
1.State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Thirumangalam, Madurai District. ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.A.V.Suganya ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto complainant
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13645 of 2020
1.Anandh 2.V.Ayothi 3.A.Sagunthala ... Petitioners / Accused No.1 to 3
Vs.
1.State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Thirumangalam, Madurai District. ... 1st Respondent / Complainant
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13644 & 13645 of 2020
2.A.V.Suganya ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto complainant
COMMON PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records and to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.4 of 2020, on the file of the first respondent as far as the petitioners are concerned.
(In both Crl.O.Ps) For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (crl.side) for R1 : Mr.R.R.Kannan for R2
COMMON ORDER
These petitions are filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.4 of 2020, on the file of the first respondent.
learned counsel for the petitioners report no instructions. Hence, the name of the petitioners was printed and the case adjourned to 25.04.2023
taken up for hearing, there was no representation on the side of the
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13644 & 13645 of 2020
petitioners. The petitioners was called absent. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 05.06.2023, under the caption “ for arguments or for orders”. Even today, ie. on 05.06.2023, there is no representation on the side of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the second respondent is ready for arguments.
extended further. In view of the above circumstances, the prosecution is directed to file charge sheet within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Ls
05.06.2023
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13644 & 13645 of 2020
R.THARANI. J.
Ls
To
Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.13644 and 13645 of 2020
05.06.2023
Aravindh
Anandh
V.V.Ayothi
A.Sagunthala
State of T.N.
A.V.Suganya
R.Tharani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
