Allowed

Sudharshan Sahoo v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 May 2023CRL OP/6907/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a Criminal Original Petition. The petitioner faces charges for possessing PDS rice without a license. The Court imposes conditions including a non-refundable deposit of Rs.25,000, reporting to police, and executing a bond with sureties to prevent absconding and tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail with conditions: deposit of Rs.25,000 to the District Revenue Officer, execution of bond with two sureties, reporting to police, and no tampering with evidence.

Sudharshan Sahoo Vs the Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.6907 of 2023

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.6907 of 2023

¶3

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 6(4) of the Tamil Nadu Scheduled Commodities [RDCS] Order, 1982 r/w Section (7)(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.184 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶5

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 25000 Kgs of PDS rice worth about Rs.6,26,235/- without obtaining any permission or license from the Tamil Nadu State Government. Hence the complaint.

¶6

The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient sureties and to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. He would also submit that without prejudice, the petitioner is prepared to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- as a non-refundable deposit to " the District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur " . Hence, he prays for

¶7

Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶8

Crl.O.P.No.6907 of 2023

¶9

grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶10

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was found in possession of 25000 Kgs of PDS rice worth about Rs.6,26,235/-. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶11

In order to curb the illegal activities of transporting PDS rice, the petitioner undertakes to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) as a non-refundable deposit to " the District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur ," without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. However, it is made clear that merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶12

Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions of both

¶13

sides, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶14

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), by way of Demand

¶15

Draft/RTGS/NEFT to the "District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur" , without

¶16

Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.6907 of 2023

¶18

prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court, on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶19

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶20

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

¶21

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶22

Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.O.P.No.6907 of 2023

¶24

S.SOUNTHAR, J. kmi

¶25

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶26

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶27

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶28