Allowed

Prema Govindrajan v. Police Department

Madras HC4 May 2023CRL OP/10012/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners seeking protection from arrest in a grudge filed by a defacto complainant involving assault and public mischief. Bail was conditioned upon executing a bond, regular reporting to police, and non-absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions including execution of bond with two sureties, identity proof submission, daily reporting to police for two weeks, and prohibition of absconding or evidence t

Prema Govindrajan Vs Police Department — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶3

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

¶4

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC @ Section 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act r/w.387 of IP, in Crime No.411 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

¶5

2.The case of the prosecution is that there is a civil dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. In the melee, petitioners attacked the defacto complainant's sister and abused in filthy language and given life threaten to the defacto complainant. They attacked them and caused injury. Hence, the case.

¶6

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this is a case in counter and that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against them. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶7

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that this is a case in counter and that the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant and abused her with filthy language and sustained injuries. He further submitted that the injured

¶8

Page 1 of 4

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶11

has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶12

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶13

Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case and also of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶14

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶15

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶16

Page 2 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶19

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶21

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶22

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶23

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

04.05.2023

ub/kal

Page 3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶29

S.SOUNTHAR, J.,

¶30

ub/kal

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.10012 of 2023

¶32

04.05.2023

¶33

Page 4 of 4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prema Govindrajan v. Police Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prema Govindrajan v. Police Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Super Cassettes Industies Pvt.Ltd., Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and 36 Others

M/S.Sangeetha Caterers and Consultants LLP Vs Hotel Sangeethaa Pure Veg

M/S.United Spirits Limited Vs Jyothy Labs Ltd.and 3 Others

Raj Kumar Vs Inspector of Police

Yuvaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Saratha @Sarathampal Vs Inspector of Police