5.1. He further submitted that the rival political party leader had seen a Tamil movie “Asuran” and had twitted that the film is not a movie, but a lesson. Therefore, the petitioner had twitted that he believed that the panchami land has to be returned by the respondent trust by learning lesson from the said movie, since there has been a consistent demand from many organizations and political parties to restore panchami land from the respondent trust to its lawful owners. After the twit, the respondent's political party leader had shown the patta copy of the respondent trust in support of his claim. By way of reply, the petitioner has twitted that the patta copy is not a title document and made a demand to show the title deed and parent document related to the respondent. Though the respondent's political party leader replied that where ever it required, it will be produced at appropriate time before the suitable forum, he did not come forward to produce any title deed as promised by him. Therefore, there is no defamatory words in the twits made by the petitioner.
