Dismissed

B.S.B.Paul v. the State Rep by

Madras HC1 Dec 2023CRL OP/3212/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing an FIR. The Court held the petition infructuous because the investigation was completed and a final report filed, leading to the taking of cognizance by the Additional Mahila Court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

B.S.B.Paul Vs the State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.12.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022 and

¶7

Crl.M.P.No.1468 of 2022

1.B.S.B.Paul

2.Sujith Paul

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, W-18, All Women's Police Station, MKB Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.32 of 2021)

¶13

2.Immaculate Jasmine Linda ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for entire records comprised in FIR in Crime No.32 of 2021 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-18, All Women's Police Station, MKB Nagar, Chennai, the 1^st Respondent herein and quash the same as against these Petitioners.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.Vimal B.Crimson For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

For R2 : Mr.S.Thirumavalavan

¶17

ORDER

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Page 1 of 4

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022

¶21

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the FIR in Crime No.32 of 2021 pending on the file of the first respondent herein.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first

¶23

respondent would submit that the first respondent had completed the investigation in Crime No.32 of 2021 and filed a final report and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.36 of 2023, on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition become infructuous.

¶24

3. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

01.12.2023

¶26

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order mn

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022

¶29

¶30

1.The Inspector of Police, W-18, All Women's Police Station, MKB Nagar, Chennai.

¶31

2.The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022

¶34

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. mn

¶35

Crl.O.P.No.3212 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.1468 of 2022

¶36

01.12.2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4

B.S.B.Paul v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.S.B.Paul v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Joel Vs State Rep by

S.Srividhya, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Natharsha Vs State Represented by

V.S.Thamilan Vs the State Rep by

Arun Vs the State Rep.by

M/S.Kalpa Health Care (P) Ltd. Vs the State of Tamilnadu