T.Ramakrishnan v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
A petitioner sought police protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for agricultural activities on his land following a complaint regarding interference with possession. The Court noted that the underlying complaint was accompanied by rivals' undertakings not to interfere and was subsequently closed, leading this Court to close the petition as well without granting the protection sought. None of the o
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.4659 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.No.4659 of 2023
T.Ramakrishnan
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.State by the Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District.
- 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirukoilur, Kallakurichi District.
- 3.The Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for police protection for agricultural activities on his property based on a dismissed complaint.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Ramakrishnan
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court