Disposed

M.Hajira v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC18 Jul 2023CRL OP/1278/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras disposed of a criminal original petition seeking a direction to register a complaint and file an FIR. The court directed the petitioner to cooperate with police inquiry, which must be conducted within two weeks per Lalitha Kumari guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to cooperate with police; police to conduct inquiry within two weeks.

M.Hajira Vs the Commissioner of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.07.2023

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.1278 of 2023

¶6

M.Hajira ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Commissioner of Poice, Chennai District, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, G-1, Police Station, Chennai. ...Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original petition file under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure

¶10

Code seeking to direct the 2^nd respondent to register the petitioner complaint and file a FIR.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Murali For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to register

¶14

the petitioner complaint and file the FIR.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

2.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, based on the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in RC.No.164/AC/Vep/Camp/AC cep Tapal/22 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶18

3.The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the Police for enquiry and the respondent Police shall conduct the enquiry keeping in mind the judgment in Lalitha Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 . On completion of the enquiry, the respondent Police shall take a decision regarding the further course of action. This process shall be completed by the respondent Police within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶19

4.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶20

18.07.2023

¶21

Speaking Order : Yes/No Index : Yes/No ssr

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

¶25

1.The Commissioner of Poice, Chennai District, Chennai.

¶26

2.The Inspector of Police, G-1, Police Station, Chennai.

¶27

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

N.ANAND VENKATESH,J

¶31

ssr

¶32

CRL.O.P.No.1278 of 2023

¶33

18.07.2023

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

4/4

M.Hajira v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Hajira v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Jayababu Vs the State Rep by Its

Meena Anand Vs State of Tamilnadu

K.Velu Vs the State Rep by

M/S.Sri Balaji Steel Industries, Rep by Its Ansu Kumar Vs Sop, Tiruvallur District

Dhanasurya @ Sureshkumar Vs State Represented by

R.Paramanandhan Vs Commissioner of Police