G.Boopathi v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
This High Court quashed an FIR based on an amicable settlement and joint compromise memo filed by the petitioners and the accused, referencing Supreme Court guidelines.
What did the court decide?
First Information Report in Crime No.08 of 2020 is quashed and connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P No.4080 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.4080 of 2022 and Crl.M.P No.2008 of 2022
- G.Boopathi 2. G.Jayakumar 3. C.Govindaraj
- H.Revathi
- G.Muniyammal
... Petitioners
Vs.
- State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.08/2020)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report in Crime No.08 of 2020 should be quashed in light of an amicable settlement between parties despite non-compoundable offences.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Boopathi
- petitioner
G.Jayakumar
- petitioner
C.Govindaraj
- petitioner
H.Revathi
- petitioner
G.Muniyammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court