petitioners. The eye witnesses have also given statements by corroborating the statement of the 2nd respondent. Hence, the petitioners and the 2nd respondent have made complaints against each other. Admittedly, there was a rent control proceedings pending between the 2nd petitioner and the client of the 2nd respondent in which an eviction order has been passed to evict the tenant of the 2nd petitioner by name M/s.Bharat Scans. The 2nd respondent who is the advocate of the 2nd petitioner's tenant was present at the time of carrying out eviction. Both parties who were at loggerheads could have caused some unrest or violence. But it cannot be known who was the aggressor and who had committed the crime. Since both parties throw counter allegations against each other and both of them claimed that they have got materials to substantiate their case, it is obligatory on the part of the first respondent to conduct investigation, simultaneously. But unfortunately, charge sheet has been filed in the present case only and in other case, the investigation is still pending. However, it is open to the petitioners to furnish the materials available with them at the time of trial. Only if the accused are subjected to trial, the criminal liability on the part of the accused can be known. Even though the charges have been framed, the
