R.Vignesh v. the Sub-Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The court cancelled interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner for failure to deposit the required security amount despite extensions. The criminal original petition was dismissed, but liberty was granted to file a fresh bail application.
What did the court decide?
Interim anticipatory bail cancelled and criminal original petition dismissed; liberty granted to file a fresh bail application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.327 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.327 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that this Court, on the undertaking given by the petitioners that they are ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.2 lakhs each to the credit of crime number, has granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners on 20.01.2023. Whereas, the petitioners have not complied with the above order and when the matter was listed on 28.02.2023 for reporting compliance, the petitioners had sought for extension of time to comply with the said condition and this Court had also extended the time till 28.03.2023 to comply with the said order. He further submitted that the petitioners are taking undue advantage of the orders of this Court and till date, the petitioners have not deposited the said amount.
- Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and
also the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners stands cancelled.
Crl.O.P.No.327 of 2023
ham
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail should be cancelled due to non-compliance with the condition to deposit a security amount.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu / Interested Parties
Coram
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court