The High Court cancelled interim anticipatory bail and dismissed a Criminal Original Petition for non-compliance with a condition to deposit Rs. 30,00,000/- with the concerned Magistrate, despite extensions granted earlier.
Cancellation of interim anticipatory bail and dismissal of the Criminal Original Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.1255 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.1255 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.850 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The matter is listed today under the caption “for reporting compliance”.
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.1255 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
ham
are unable to arrange the amount, further, this Court had also permitted the de-facto complainant to withdraw the amount, thereby, they have not complied with the order passed by this Court, however, they have preferred a Special Leave Petition in SLP(Crl) Diary No.12013 of 2023 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the order passed by this Court dated 24.01.2023 and the petitioners have also filed a memo before this Court.
non-compliance of condition. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.03.2023
ham
Crl.O.P.No.1255 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.850 of 2023
Note : Issue order copy on 06.04.2023
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners should continue when they fail to comply with the condition of depositing security.
Whether the Criminal Original Petition survives dismissal due to non-compliance with court orders.
Petitioners
Respondent
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
