Jeevan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail petition filed by three accused persons remanded to custody for offences involving murder and explosives. The court granted bail considering the investigation was practically over.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners ordered to be released on bail by executing separate bonds for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties each for Rs.10,000/-.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.26784 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.11.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Crl.O.P.No.26784 of 2023
1.Jeevan S/o.Saravanan.
2.Baba @ Kamalakannan S/o.Karunakaran
3.Bharath @ Bharathraj S/o.Rajendran
...Petitioners/Accused
Vs.
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram District.
(Crime No.977 of 2023) ...Respondent
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to be enlarged on bail pending investigation in Crime No.977 of 2023 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
Whether the period of detention and facts of the case justify granting bail despite the initial denial by the prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Jeevan S/o.Saravanan
- petitioner
2.Baba @ Kamalakannan S/o.Karunakaran
- petitioner
3.Bharath @ Bharathraj S/o.Rajendran
- respondent
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court