Single judge rejected an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC filed under the IPC, dismissing it because the injured party remained in the hospital at the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.26732 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.26732 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner/A2 in Crime No.456 of 2023 registered under Sections
294(b), 323, 386 and 506(ii) IPC seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent.
3.It is stated that the injured still in hospital. At this stage, application for anticipatory bail under the said provision will not lie. Hence, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
24.11.2023
kp
Crl.O.P.No.26732 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
kp
Crl.O.P.No.26732 of 2023
24.11.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application can be allowed when the injured person is still in the hospital.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.V. Karthikeyan
State
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
