Partly allowed

Balavalli v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Oct 2023CRL OP/23701/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a criminal appeal, authorizing their release on execution of a bond with two sureties and subject to strict conditions regarding reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to execute a bond with sureties, appear within 15 days, and adhere to reporting and conduct conditions.

Balavalli Vs Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶4

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 352, 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.557 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.

¶5

The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that there was

¶6

a dispute for parking of vehicle and it is also stated that the petitioners were also given complaint, which was registered by the respondent police in Crime No.558 of 2023.

¶7

In view of these facts, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction

¶8

1/4

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶11

of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶12

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶13

[b] the petitioners 1 and 2 shall report before the respondent police as and when required and the 3^rd petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 10 days and thereafter, as and when required.

¶14

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶15

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶16

2/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶19

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶20

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

16.10.2023

gvn/mkn2

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶26

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶27

gvn/mkn2

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.23701 of 2023

¶29

16.10.2023

¶30

4/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Balavalli v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balavalli v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajangam Vs the Inspector of Police

Dhandapani Vs the State Rep by Its

A.Esthar Anitha Vs State Rep.by

Abudhakeer @ Syed Abudhakeer Vs State Rep by

Sridhar Vs Inspector of Police

Y.Augustin Arun Vs State Rep by