The single judge of the High Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail filed by an accused apprehending arrest for alleged illegal transportation of river sand. The Court refused the plea citing Supreme Court directions on illegal sand mining.
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.21843 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.21843 of 2023
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of I.P.C, in Crime No.428 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
respondent police submitted that the petitioner along with other accused have
Crl.O.P.No.21843 of 2023
illegally transported 5 bags of river sand in a two wheeler. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Government Advocate (crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.
the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding illegal sand mining, smuggling and theft of sand and minerals, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
22.09.2023
ata
Crl.O.P.No.21843 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., ata
Crl.O.P.No.21843 of 2023
22.09.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused who apprehend arrest for illegal transportation of river sand.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The Petitioner
Respondent Police
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
