The single judge closed the criminal original petition and connected criminal miscellaneous petition granting liberty to move appropriate application if the quash petition is disposed of. Interim anticipatory bail was already granted.
Closed the court petition with liberty to file appropriate application if quash petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.5958 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.4262 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
The learned counsel for the
petitioner submitted that F.I.R was
stayed in quash petition and hence there is no facilitate for anticipatory bail.
anticipatory bail was granted by this Court.
Original Petition is closed with liberty to
the respective parties to move appropriate application if quash petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Crl.M.P. is closed.
21.09.2023
nvi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose the anticipatory bail application after the quash petition was stayed.
RMT.
unknown
TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
