Disposed

R.Vadivel v. State Rep by

Madras HC14 Sept 2023CRL OP/21048/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC. The petitioner sought a direction for police protection during the construction of a compound wall. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the police for an enquiry within four weeks before granting any relief.

What did the court decide?

Direction to submit a representation for police protection; police to enquire and decide within four weeks.

R.Vadivel Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.09.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶7

R.Vadivel

¶8

S/o.Late G.Raju Gounder

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The Inspector of Police, Kotagiri Police Station, Kotagiri,

¶12

Nilgiris District – 643 217.

¶13

2.Rajagopal, S/o.Ramasamy

¶14

3.Magali, S/o.Karuppan

¶15

4.Marimuthu, S/o.Velan

¶16

5.Murugan, S/o.Ponnan

¶17

6.Velliyangiri, S/o.Murugan

¶18

7.Thillaimani, S/o.Maran

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶22

8.Periyasamy, S/o.Subramani

¶23

... Respondents

¶24

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to direct the first respondent/police to provide adequate police protection on the date of constructing the compound wall of the petitioner's property situated at Old Survey No.15/2, New Survey No.1446/8, Kotagiri Village, Kotagiri Taluk.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor [R1] *****

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to

¶28

the first respondent to provide adequate police protection on the date of

¶29

constructing the compound wall in the petitioner's property situated at Old. Survey No.15/2, New Survey No.1446/8, Kotagiri Village, Kotagiri Taluk.

¶30

2. Heard Mr.T.Karunakaran, learned counsel for petitioner and

¶31

Mr.A.Damodaran, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for first

¶32

respondent.

¶33

2/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶36

3. There shall be a direction to the petitioner to submit a representation/fresh complaint before the first respondent in person and the first respondent, on receipt of the same, shall call the parties and make an enquiry and take a decision within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of the petitioner's representation/complaint.

¶37

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above

¶38

direction.

¶39

14.09.2023

¶40

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No apd/gm

¶41

¶42

1.The Inspector of Police, Kotagiri Police Station, Kotagiri, Nilgiris District – 643 217.

¶43

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶44

3/4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶47

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

¶48

apd/gm

¶49

Criminal Original Petition No.21048 of 2023

¶50

14.09.2023

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

4/4

R.Vadivel v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vadivel v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani Vs State Rep.by

Ravichandran Vs State Rep by

Jahir Hussain Vs Inspector of Police

B.Prabhu Vs Inspector of Police

Latha Vs State Rep by

Roshan Vs the Superintendent of Police