Mani v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR. The court closed the petition because the State Prosecutor submitted that the final investigation report was filed and taken on file by the Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition is closed as the final report filed by the accused is taken on file by the Magistrate.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P No.18983 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.18983 of 2023
Mani Petitioner
vs.
1.State Represented by Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Town Police Station, Arakkonam, Crime No.650 of 2016
2.Devarajulu
Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the First Information Report registered in Crime No.650 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016 on the file of the Respondent Arakkonam Town Police Station, Arakkonam, Vellore District, Quash the same.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mani
- respondent
State
- respondent
Devarajulu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court