Vargish v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence. Court found no ground for bail in a POCSO case where the petitioner was convicted of sexual assault and kidnapping.
What did the court decide?
Petition for suspension of sentence and bail dismissed; sentence remains in force.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.5647 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.452 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.M.P.No.5647 of 2023
in Crl.A.No.452 of 2023
Vargish ... Petitioner
Vs.
State rep by The Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.235 of 2014) ... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C, praying to suspend the sentence made in Spl.C.C.No.46 of 2019, on the file of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore dated 29.03.2023 and enlarge the petitioner on bail.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jayan
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner convicted under POCSO Act and IPC.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail/suspension of sentence considering his age and ailments.
Whether any grounds exist to reconsider the conviction findings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vargish
- respondent
State rep by The Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore District
Coram
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court