5.The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that from the evidence of P.W.1 it is clear that the petitioner was very much interested in marrying the victim girl and in fact, he went to the house of the victim girl asking for marriage, but the parents of the victim girl opposed, for the reason that the petitioner is a Christian. Despite the same, P.W.1 continued her relationship with the petitioner and they had physical relationship. He would submit that the victim girl is a major, educated and knowingly she allowed the petitiner to continue his relationship with her, the petitioner was also willing to marry her and it is only on the objection of parents of P.W.1, their marriage could not be performed. Thereafter the petitioner attempted to marry another girl, at that time the victim girl qustioned the same and forced the petitioner to marry her which the petitioner could not accept. He would submit that both during chief and cross examination P.W.1/victim girl confirms that there is no compulsion, false promise, inducement and forcible physical relationship has been committed. He further submitted that now the petitioner is married and settled with his wife and the victim girl is also married to another man and they are having their respective
