The High Court allowed the petitioner's condonation of delay petition under section 5 of the Limitation Act for filing a criminal appeal, being satisfied with the affidavit reasons. The appeal was numbered and listed for admission.
Petition is allowed; registry directed to number criminal appeal and list for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.11747 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.19672 of 2023
Crl.M.P.No.11747 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.19672 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to
condone the delay of 329 days in filing the Criminal Appeal against the Judgment dated 23.03.2022 in C.C.No.239 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai.
did not raise any serious objection in allowing this petition.
filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
otherwise in order, and list the matter for admission.
14.09.2023
vum
R.HEMALATHA, J.
Crl.M.P.No.11747 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.19672 of 2023
vum
Crl.M.P.No.11747 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.19672 of 2023
14.09.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 329 days in filing a criminal appeal should be condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
