This single-judge order condones an 8-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, allowing the petition as reasons in the affidavit were found satisfactory.
Petition allowed; registry directed to number and list the Criminal Revision for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.11581 of 2023 and
Crl.M.P.No.11581 of 2023 and Crl.R.C.No.34872 of 2023
Crl.R.C.SR.No.34872 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 8 days in preferring the Criminal Revision against the Judgment dated 31.03.2023 in C.A.No.1 of 2022 pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu.
printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the respondent. This Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
22.09.2023
vum
Crl.M.P.No.11581 of 2023 and Crl.R.C.No.34872 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
vum
Crl.M.P.No.11581 of 2023 and Crl.R.C.SR.No.34872 of 2023
22.09.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 8 days in filing Criminal Revision can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
