D.Jayanthi v. L.Sathish
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for filing a criminal revision. The court was satisfied with the reasons provided in the affidavit and directed the registry to number the revision.
What did the court decide?
The petition to condone delay of 53 days in filing criminal revision is allowed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.11459 of 2023 and
Crl.M.P.No.11459 of 2023 and Crl.R.C.No.35636 of 2023
Crl.R.C.SR.No.35636 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to
condone the delay of 53 days in filing the Criminal Revision against the Judgment dated 09.02.2023 in M.C.No.13 of 2021 pending on the file of the Family Court at Thiruvallur.
- Though notice was served on the respondent and his name is
printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the respondent. This Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in
support of this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
- Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is in
order, and list the matter for admission.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 53 days in filing a Criminal Revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unnamed Petitioner
- respondent
Unnamed Respondent
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court