the same version of P.W.2. A neighbour, one Pandian , who heard about the incident as hearsay, was examined as P.W.4. Another neighbour, one Saravanan , who came to the house of P.W.1, upon hearing the commotion to find that the victim child had committed suicide by hanging, was examined as P.W.5. The Doctor, who examined the accused and issued Potency Certificate, was examined as P.W.6. The another Doctor, who also examined the accused along with P.W.6, was examined as P.W.7. The witness to the Observation Mahazar and Rough sketch, namely, one Subramani, was examined as P.W.8. The Photographer, who took the pictures of the victim child found hanging at her home, was examined as P.W.9. The Judicial Magistrate, who recorded the statements of P.W.1 & P.W.2, under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., was examined as P.W.10. The SubInspector of Police, who registered the First Information Report, by obtaining the statement of P.W.1, was examined as P.W.11. The Dr.Kulainthavelu , Civil Surgeon of Forensic medicine, who conducted the Postmortem of the dead body of the victim child, was examined as P.W.12. Both the Investigating Officers of this case were examined as P.W.13 & P.W.14.
