Ramesh v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.A.No.254 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.03.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.A.No.254 of 2012
Ramesh ... Appellant Versus State by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Poonamalee, Kancheepuram District. ...Respondent (Crime No.15 of 2005)
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment of the Learned Sessions Judgecum- Mahila Court, Chinglepattu (FAC), Kancheepuram District in S.C.No.208 of 2008, dated 22.03.2012.
For Appellant : Mr. T.R. Ravi For Respondent : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
JUDGMENT
The sole accused in Crime No.15 of 2005 on the file of the All Women Police Station, Poonamalee, has preferred this appeal, aggrieved by the Judgment dated 22.03.2012 in and by which he was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC., and was imposed with the
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accidental omission in the title of the document affects the penal consequences of the offence.
Whether the court has the power to reduce the sentence under the proviso to Section 376 based on special reasons.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramesh
- respondent
State
Coram
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court